Why was this direction given to surveill this Mother?
Premier,
Why was this Mother, in the article below, treated so badly by an ex-Eventide Nursing Unit Manager (NUM)? Is it perhaps because the Mother dared to complain about her Son's care?
Why was a staff member so terrified of this ex - Eventide NUM, that she contacted an advocacy group to report that residents were put to bed late on the night of 25 August 2007, because staff were busy working on James Jenner's file?
Why was this ex - Eventide NUM able to direct staff to have this Mother under surveillance?
Why was this ex-Eventide NUM, able to be instrumental in having the guardianship removed from this Mother, just days before James Jenner's death?
Why did it take three days before James Jenner's death was reported to the Queensland Police Service?
Why did this Mother have to endure three hours in a Queensland Police station where she was cautioned? This interview took place less than a week after James died.
Why did the sum of $500,000, put aside for James, dramatically reduce to $100,000 after his death?
There are many other questions still unanswered regarding this case.
Premier,
SING HAS EVIDENCE THAT THIS EX-EVENTIDE NUM, BULLIED, INTIMIDATED, HARASSED AND SWORE AT OUT OF FAVOUR STAFF, ON MANY OCCASIONS. SING HAS EVIDENCE THAT THIS IS STILL A COMMON TRAIT AT EVENTIDE, UNLESS YOU ARE ONE OF THE FAVOURED FEW.
SING IS IN POSSESSION OF SOME OF THE EXIT STATEMENTS OF STAFF WHO ENDURED SUCH BULLYING AND HARASSMENT AT THE HANDS OF EVENTIDE MANAGEMENT.
SING HAS EVIDENCE OF THE SHOCKING PHYSICAL STATE OF JAMES JENNER, SHORTLY BEFORE HIS DEATH.
SING SUGGESTS AGAIN, THAT NOTHING SHORT OF A PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY INTO SOME OF THESE MATTERS WILL SUFFICE.
No comments:
Post a Comment